Laura Goldstein

@AGoldsteinGirl

Rotate photo View full size
Pleasure P is a Child Molester PROOF- court document 4

Views 15,076

1752 days ago

Pleasure P is a Child Molester PROOF- court document 4

36 Comments

Realtime comments disabled

RaaquelLR 1545 days ago

I'd like to know where you've read the name of Marcus Cooper in this document, bitch!

eswright 1751 days ago

Notice up top the childs name is Maurice which last time i checked was a boys name not a girls name. Additionally, you left out all the pages that actually detail WHY the child is really being removed from the house.

2muchforyall 1751 days ago

i just want u to explain how he went to jail as a minor and he 24 now and his court date was 06 he was 21 @ da time and had a cd out of did this happen when he was a minor but he just went 2 trail in 06 confused. and if u are a pedophile dnt u always have

reesey_mae 1751 days ago

i dont believe none of this stuff… i mean seriously the age and dates dont even match up.. it was claimed that he did this in 2002/03 when he was 16/17 really??? he was born in 1984?????????

jayAbelardiza10 1751 days ago

yo heffa drop it your 20 minutes of fame is up so you been served lmfao money hungry bitch !!!

Magically_Delic 1751 days ago

Even as a minor you have to be registered

Back2NikkiJ 1751 days ago

doesn't even say he molested anyone, just that he can't be in the house with them, this chick is really trying to make it, and all she really is doing is gonna get her daddy sued or worse HER A** BEAT!

ksheree322 1751 days ago

Yes, he would still be registered even if he WAS a minor. Your age has nothing to do with the fact of whether or not you're a child molester.

A_MAYSing 1752 days ago

He's probably not registered because he was convicted as a minor

flyyasskai 1752 days ago

YOU DIDN'T HAVE TO PUT A CHILD'S NAME ALL OVER THA INTERNET. ALL DATED 2006, IF HE WAS CONVICTED, HE'D BE REGISTERED... HE IS NOT.

PeaceImages 1752 days ago

oh wow.. u can see the yout's name. smh @ this situation!!

mztanyatee 1752 days ago

I agree with remove the childs name man!!! thats just wrong....release the documents if u want but at least protect the child!

LeiKillsBarbies 1752 days ago

cont:: tryna make a point but the child at least deserves privacy eeeiiish

LeiKillsBarbies 1752 days ago

REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - damn,we know you tryna make a

rello5 1752 days ago

the kids name it might be a problem with that dont tarnish a kid to get revenge on someone she should know better

ItsOhsoamazing 1752 days ago

this just show child listed needs to be placed somewhere else

BrandyLuvli 1752 days ago

where does it say child molestation??? then other documents have diff dates>> IM NOT CONVINCED

CAKEndSTACKS 1752 days ago

REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME ..

neilmcgrath 1752 days ago

REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOV

neilmcgrath 1752 days ago

REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOVE THE CHILDS NAME - REMOV