RT @ayman_nour ...
بعد حادث مندو ب الشرطه لماذا لأيستقيل وزير الداخلية إذا كان الرئيس غير قادر علي أقالته


Reading your question reminded me with a book that I read on the 1967 disastrous defeat. The book was written by Robert Fisk; a celebrated and knowledgeable British author specialized in Middle East affairs.

Robert Fisk said, and I only paraphrase, that after the six day defeat, as a result of Marshal Aammer's incredible incompetence and corruption, president Nasser announced his resignation, on National television to 45 incredulous Egyptians who, once completed his TV speech, went out all 45 million of them demanding that he stayed to regroup and lead the nation to regain its lost honor.

In the wake of this deluge of heaving people emotion, he accepted three days later to stay on.

In the meantime Marshal Aammer also had announced his resignation immediately following Nasser, but when Nasser accepted the nation's demand to stay on, Marshal Aammer wanted to withdraw his as well, thinking that it was a ranch and since the chief ranchman stayed, there was no reason for him to go either.

Of course, Nasser rounded all of them up and Aammer committed a circumspect suicide.

Robert Fisk said that it was the love of power and privileges that blinded that incompetent fool who lead the nation into the most ignominious defeat in the history of war conflicts to think that the nation was a ranch that he had inherited and no one should take it away from him.

The same thing is taking place now with the Mubarak and his henchmen. Egypt is but a ranch, and no one should take it away from them.

If the people keep acting like cattle, the henchmen will never sell the ranch to them. They will definitely try to pass it to their offspring.

A revolution is inevitable to deposit the monkeys back into the Zoo from which they had escaped to jump all over the people.